Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute little “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a tussle between a closed attraction, public officials and advocacy groups.
But those working directly with the whales say the heated discussion over their destiny often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who see them each day.
After the federal government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to put them down unless the authorities pays for the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious situation.
Experts say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and communal behavior indicate they are remarkably smart animals – something one caretaker discovered personally.
She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that involved gaining confidence of the marine predators.
“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”
The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the subtleties and unique traits in their personalities. She cultivated a deep bond for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.
“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive relationships.”
Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a background of increasing societal concern to their confinement.
During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park attributes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say points to the inadequate care in which they were maintained.
The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes effects of the closure. “Structural materials is breaking off from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The facility did not reply to a questionnaire, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far higher quality veterinary services and 24/7 care than any individual in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”
The former employee was terminated from the facility in recent months following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the facility thought particulars of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was fired soon after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the facility’s threat to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any attempts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “considerable staff”, equipment and specialized tools.
“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for calls for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.
In late September, the nation’s fisheries minister rejected a proposal to export the whales to an overseas location.
“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As Canadians, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing approve an transfer that would continue the situation these belugas have endured.”
But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”
As officials struggle to find a answer, proposals have emerged, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of food for Indigenous peoples.
A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The planned facility, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain hopeful that it could in time represent a long term answer for some of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ fate.
Others say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the coming months.
An official, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and diet the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|
A tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering AI, cybersecurity, and digital trends across global markets.